View Full Version : KOXX new bike line up
austintrials
01-25-2006, 02:21 PM
i was looking around on KOXX web site and found that they are going a new direction.
Kinda Kool, i dont know the spec.
Motorfiets1234
01-25-2006, 02:32 PM
need a chain...but besides that not to bad
Sir_Crackien
01-25-2006, 02:47 PM
the rear wheels are not even close to being at the right angles. i'm all for looking at good photoshop but please stop with the trials one they really just don't work because the bikes are already so messed up looking.
sorry for the rant but its just my opinion
I was starting to think it was real :dunno: Looks very real :bowrofl:
austintrials
01-25-2006, 04:01 PM
the rear wheels are not even close to being at the right angles. i'm all for looking at good photoshop but please stop with the trials one they really just don't work because the bikes are already so messed up looking.
sorry for the rant but its just my opinion
they are not supossed to be lined up, its like a 3 quarter view.
Shit i forgot the chain, oh well
mads_junior2
01-26-2006, 06:24 AM
Bwahaha! look at that! It can't be a real KOXX bicycle!!
Seriously!
KOXX would NEVER make a bike with a WHITE spacer between the stem and headset!
It might be fake...!
myergin
01-26-2006, 10:34 AM
the rear wheels are not even close to being at the right angles. i'm all for looking at good photoshop but please stop with the trials one they really just don't work because the bikes are already so messed up looking.
sorry for the rant but its just my opinion
agreed
austintrials
01-26-2006, 11:09 AM
agreed
Dont look !:bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl:
Small_fox
01-26-2006, 11:32 AM
whoooooa.....good look !
Sir_Crackien
01-26-2006, 06:50 PM
if that was a 3/4 veiw then you could see the top of the handle bars and many other parts of the bike that you are not showing. also the wheels would be at an angle that is not represented the least.
not putting down the work but the tandem was more than enuogh
Ross W.
01-26-2006, 06:56 PM
fuckin sick
austintrials
01-27-2006, 08:49 AM
if that was a 3/4 veiw then you could see the top of the handle bars and many other parts of the bike that you are not showing. also the wheels would be at an angle that is not represented the least.
not putting down the work but the tandem was more than enuogh
A 3/4 view is not always going to includes the top and side. 3/4 view which this one is, can show the side and front view, which will not show the top of the object.:down:
Here is a picture in 3/4 view and not showing the top, This picture was used as reference. :Owned:
com on the frame is seen from the side and the rear wheel from an angle. doesn't that seem strange tot you. go back to the drawing board
Sir_Crackien
01-27-2006, 03:29 PM
if you look at the pics the referance photo is a 3/4 side view and it looks right. this is because it shows the proper angles on all the other parts of the bike (look at teh h-hars)
YOURS is a 3/4 top view and YOU HAVE TO SHOW THE TOP OF THE BARS AND OTHER THINGS TO MAKE IT LOOK RIGHT!:Owned::Owned:
trust me don't start this battle i'm not righting these post to spite you just to help you look at teh bigger picture in the proper fashion
austintrials
01-28-2006, 08:53 AM
if you look at the pics the referance photo is a 3/4 side view and it looks right. this is because it shows the proper angles on all the other parts of the bike (look at teh h-hars)
YOURS is a 3/4 top view and YOU HAVE TO SHOW THE TOP OF THE BARS AND OTHER THINGS TO MAKE IT LOOK RIGHT!:Owned::Owned:
trust me don't start this battle i'm not righting these post to spite you just to help you look at teh bigger picture in the proper fashion
the "battle" :luke:
I said that the image that I just posted was a reference, no the original image that I worked from. Keep looking at the image and this post, because I want it to Consume you.....:D
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.